CAT-holics


Home | Pages | Archives


An interesting property of the trapezium

April 30, 2013 9:00 AM

Posted by catcracker

Categories: All, Mathematics

Tags: , , ,

10 Responses to “An interesting property of the trapezium”

  1. Is this funda applicable to both Normal Trapezium and Isosceles Trapezium? Plz reply…

    By Avinash on July 13, 2013 at 11:45 AM

  2. Yes it is, Avinash – if you notice, in the proof, we have not made any assumptions about the non-parallel sides; they could be equal or not, it doesn’t matter.

    regards
    J

    By catcracker on July 13, 2013 at 1:45 PM

  3. Hello Sir,

    Kindly please explain how we got the ratio of areas of two similar triangles as p^2 : q^2

    By Akshatt Sharma on November 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM

    1. Standard result for any two similar figures. See the post on similarity of triangles.

      regards
      J

      By catcracker on November 5, 2015 at 5:14 PM

      1. Can you please help me with the flow of studying “Geometry” for CAT. Am confused as i started with Trapezium.

        How should i move step by step?

        By akshatsha on November 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM

  4. In 15 days? All I can say is “Good Luck”.

    regards
    J

    By catcracker on November 12, 2015 at 12:21 PM

  5. May i know which theorem is used for comparing AOB and AOD.How is their ratio are in p:q could you explain.

    By JV on March 30, 2016 at 2:13 PM

    1. Think about it for a moment… Area = 1/2 * base * height. So if the heights are the same (as is the case here) area will be proportional to the base, correct?

      regards
      J

      By catcracker on March 30, 2016 at 6:23 PM

  6. Hi J, Please help me with the flow of Geometry. Also wanted your suggestion if CAT 2018 is possible starting October for a CA

    By Sweta on October 5, 2018 at 9:51 PM

    1. Just go the Euclid way. Start with points/lines/planes and prove your way upwards through triangles, quads, polygons, circles and 3-D stuff. (Prove everything to yourself, else you won’t be able to apply it) Take a detour though trigo and co-geo at some point.

      As to the latter query: possible, yes; easy, no. You might end up settling for something less than what you are capable of. I am assuming you have already filled the form, or else the question is moot 🙂 If you are already very strong in either English or Maths, go for it seriously; if you are moderate at best in both, then take 18 just for the experience and plan for 19 as the serious attempt.

      regards
      J

      By catcracker on October 6, 2018 at 11:38 AM

Leave a Reply



Mobile Site | Full Site


Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.